Quote: from starfleetcommand on 4:12 am on Jan. 11, 2006 Firing a missile into the Pentagon isn't to obvious? Right? I think this myth has been busted.
Yup.
neobud
NOPE! Show me film evidence to PROVE to the world ONCE and for all that a 767 crashed into the white house. I have given you FILM PROOF that there was no jet. Give me FILM proof that there was not. Show me filmed proof that there was.
fishman
Quote: from neobud on 6:13 am on Jan. 11, 2006 NOPE! Show me film evidence to PROVE to the world ONCE and for all that a 767 crashed into the white house. I have given you FILM PROOF that there was no jet. Give me FILM proof that there was not. Show me filmed proof that there was.
I think there's been enough witnesses to prove it.
Pretty convincing. A conspiracy site that includes a crashed plane. Ok, im confused lmao
starfleetcommand
Can we finally put this thread behind us now Neo?
CanadianDAN
LOL
PutTheKnivesOn
Thats a hell of a hole though. :)
neobud
No, I want to know how a 16' single hole was found that went through 3 rings of The Pentagon. There are WAY too many things that are not explained as far as I am concerned. I am not asking everyone to believe it. That is their choice.
PutTheKnivesOn
its funny how the "no parking" sign is still hanging, and burn free, especially with all that heat. Or maybe it was put up afterwards, though it would of been a little obvious!
starfleetcommand
Well after reading through some of the witness reports above I think it is fairly clear that it was a plane that hit the pentagon, and like the one guy pointed out the reason you do not see a tone of photo's out of the pentagon strike is because of all of the classified material that was scattered everywhere,and the Federal agents that were all over the scene who do not need their faces up all over the web. makes good sense to me.
