http://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2013/06/07/Industrial-Hemp-Documentary-Highlights-Hemp-History-Week So saw this and thought i would add it here. Im just reading a few articles and i see that Hemp is struggling to become legal for industrial use in some quarters and a senator has blamed Advocates for not being able to differentiate between industrial hemop and MJ. Surely its not the advocates jobs to differentiate between them both?Surely all they have to do is present a case for one or the other? It doesnt matter what way you look at it,if your pro hemo then your pro weed and pro nature. Its the senates job to seperate the two,right? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/08/ron-wyden-hemp-bill-failed_n_3404575.html If Kentucky can make industrial Hemp legal before they even make MMJ legal then why is there an issue the other way round Anyone care to shed some light on this?
