WTF... Legalising Rape? Am i reading this wrongly?

Controversial question coming up: If someone rapes a Catholic Nun, and she gets pregnant, what would happen?


Does it mean she liked it? Would the church make her abort it? Would she be excommunicated for engaging in consensual sex based on the 'fact' that she got pregnant, therefore MUST have enjoyed it, thus making the sex consensual?

 

"It was God's will." The only phrase any Catholic needs to defend anything.

 

Totally wasn't the case, but whatever. rthumgrin:

 

So, in other words, we aren't doing the virgin birth thing anymore?

 

I heard Mitt Romney is getting slammed on the news for these comments.


Was he actually the one who made these bone-head statements?

 

No. He also said he "disagrees with Todd Akin"


But he is still evil, JMO. And needs to stay out of women's wombs. So does Paul Ryan. Fuckin assholes


Romney's changing stances:


"[edit] Legality of abortion


In a 1994 debate with Senator Ted Kennedy, Romney said: "One of the great things about our nation ... is that we're each entitled to have strong personal beliefs, and we encourage other people to do the same. But as a nation, we recognize the right of all people to believe as they want and not to impose our beliefs on other people. I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years, that we should sustain and support it, and I sustain and support that law, and the right of a woman to make that choice, and my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign."[180][181][182]


During the 2002 governor's race, Romney's platform stated, "As Governor, Mitt Romney would protect the current pro-choice status quo in Massachusetts. No law would change."[183] The executive director of Massachusetts NARAL at the time, Melissa Kogut, stated that in her organization's endorsement interview with Romney, he was "emphatic that the Republican Party was not doing themselves a service by being so vehemently anti-choice."[184][185]


The Boston Globe on July 26, 2005 quoted Romney saying, "I am pro-life. I believe that abortion is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate."[186] At the May 2007 Republican Presidential debate in South Carolina, Romney stated that "Roe v. Wade has gone to such an extent that we've cheapened the value of human life." He followed by saying "the people should make [the abortion] decision, not the court."[170] Romney's spokesperson has indicated that had Romney been the governor of South Dakota, he would have signed into law the controversial law banning abortion, but he would include exceptions for cases of incest or rape, which the South Dakota law excludes.[187]


In statements since leaving the governorship, Romney has expressed his opposition to "partial birth" abortion.[19][188][189]


In 2011, Romney declined to sign a pro-life pledge sponsored by the Susan B. Anthony List to support legislation to end all taxpayer funding of abortion and to sign a law to "protect unborn children who are capable of feeling pain from abortion." The pledge also commits signers to nominate judges and appoint executive branch officials who are pro-life. Romney's spokeswoman said the pledge could have "unforeseen consequences" and that Romney could not "in good conscience sign it." Romney did not hesitate to explain his stance: "It is one thing to end federal funding for an organization like Planned Parenthood; it is entirely another to end all federal funding for thousands of hospitals across America," he wrote. "That is precisely what the pledge would demand and require of a president who signed it." [190]


During the 2012 presidential campaign, Romney promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would help overturn Roe v. Wade, allowing states to individually decide on the legality of abortion.[191] Furthermore, he will nominate judges who know the difference between personal opinion and the law.[192]


[edit] Personhood legislation


Romney has expressed support for constitutional amendments at both the state and federal level guaranteeing constitutional protections to the unborn from the moment of fertilization. During the 2008 presidential campaign, Romney said that if elected president, he would support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would legally define personhood as beginning at conception.[193] In the 2012 presidential campaign, he said that, had he as governor been presented with a state constitutional amendment to define life as beginning at conception, he would have supported it.[194]"

 

And I couldn't give you a clear stance from Paul Ryan, as it seems to change daily.

 

If I haven't said it already, I'll say it now- Take a look around. Abortion is a necessary medical procedure to rid the world of dumpster babies and excommunicated nuns.

 

That chick needs her mouth raped.....OMG!:roffl::wtf?:

 

Oh for sure AP...itd be straitup no nonsense throat fucking just to shut her up:5obsessed:

 

actually, just to cut the BS, you could club her really hard before she has a chance to answer. That's as good as a 'yes' because she at least didn't say no.


Ok now I have a serious question.. why the Hell if you mouth or ass rape a chick, you get charged with sodomy? Why can't it just be lumped in there with regular ol' rape? Is anal rape a more serious crime than vag rape?


If so, then why don't prisoners get charged with it? They just get rape charges as if they'd raped a woman in the puss... but if you rape a woman in the ass, it's not just rape, it's sodomy. WTH is up with that? And the funniest case I've heard about this was a stripper/escort/hooker getting ganged 'raped' by a bunch of frat boys... and get this.. one of them SODOMIZED her.. but the article didn't say if it was mouth sodomy or butt sodomy. I assumed butt sodomy because she seemed like a biter. But what i think really happened is they just all did their thing and then refused to pay, so she charged them with rape because shop-lifting sex from hookers isn't a legit crime yet.asssit:


btw that video is hilarious

 

Well yeah, of course, but why two separate charges? Why have a separate charge for each hole forcefully assaulted?